Summary not yet generated for this topic.
Community sentiment
Related issue
Workday ERP implementation extension→At a glance
- Public comments
- 6
- Last 30 days
- 6
Discussed at 1 meeting in the last 60 days; most recently Oct 20, 2026.
Public comments (7)
Reminded the Board the county lacks a hard-copy ledger, which worries her for auditing and power-outage scenarios.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — October 20, 2026 · 2:07:38 →A former IT professional urged the county to adopt user acceptance testing, red-line criteria, and a rollback plan for software go-lives.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — October 20, 2026 · 2:02:03 →Asked the Board to identify a 'point of no return' date, test payroll rigorously, and conduct a post-mortem on the rollout, including who bears contract costs.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — October 20, 2026 · 2:04:11 →A longtime county employee described the stress of possible missed pay, bank fees on automatic drafts, and poor communication, asking for gradual transitions with proper training in the future.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — October 20, 2026 · 2:07:59 →Vector Control's district manager described delayed and flagged paychecks for special district employees, missing journal entry functions, and poor communication, though he supports modernization.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — October 20, 2026 · 2:11:13 →Questioned why the ERP went live without full testing, asked about contract accountability and possible refunds, and separately asked whether the reduced cannabis project scope requires CEQA recirculation.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — October 20, 2026 · 1:27:32 →A Workday representative pushed back, saying the auditor's team tested for months including parallel payrolls, and offered to meet with the Board.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS — October 20, 2026 · 2:15:48 →